There's a great crowd funding effort for a national survey on the age of the Earth. Please support this worthy project. Get more info here.
How old is the Earth?
A) 4,000 years
B) 6,000 years
C) 8,000 years
D) 10,000 years
E) more than 10,000 years
Most surveys do not focus on the age of the earth to this detail. It is often assumed that an anti-evolution belief is linked to Young Earth Science (YES), but this is not the case. Just consider the Intelligent Design (ID) movement. William Dembski has accepted a Global Flood; however, to the best of our knowledge he has not adopted YES yet. Phillip Johnson, the father of ID, is also sympathetic to YES. ID as a movement has not rejected Old Earth Fallacies (OEF's). [1] They should read the Wikipedia page defending a young planet from history and science. Or better yet, get the book on Young Earth Science (YES):
Note:
1) Darwin's Doubt by Stephen Meyer (HarperCollins, NYC, 2014), p. 72.
Showing posts with label Stephen Meyer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Meyer. Show all posts
Monday, December 7, 2015
Monday, November 4, 2013
What Does the Finch Say?
Dog goes woof, Dino goes RAWR!
Bird goes tweet, platypus is meek.
Cow goes moo. Ape goes eek and Kinds are kind.
Ducks say quack and fish don’t really have legs.
But there's one sound that so few know …
WHAT DOES THE FINCH SAY?
Ga-Ga-Ga-Galapagos
Ga-Ga-Ga-Galapagos
WHAT THE FINCH SAY?
Dar-Dar-Dar-Dar-Dar-Win?
Dar-Dar-Dar-Dar-Dar-LOST!WHAT THE FINCH SAY?
Large Ground, Small Tree, Warbler Woe
Large Ground, Small Tree, Warbler WoeWHAT THE FINCH SAY?
Big black eyes, pointy beak, eat cactus and love insects.
Finches live, reproduce, all their kids are finches
still.Finches now; finches then, the finch kind is no disguise.
The secret of the finch, ancient mystery.
Somewhere deep in time, Darwin’s Doubt is hiding.When finches come to town, we can surely know.
Day Five saw finches first – it’s no mystery.
What does the finch say?
Then God said, "Let the waters abound with an
abundance of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the
face of the firmament of the heavens."
So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that moves,
with which the waters abounded, according to their kind, and every winged bird
according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, "Be
fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply
on the earth." So the evening and
the morning were the fifth day [Day Five] (Gen. 1:20-23).
Friday, August 3, 2012
Of Pandas and People
In
the famous Dover, PA Intelligent Design (ID) case, Of Pandas and People (OPAP) by
Percival Davis and Dean Kenyon was at the center of attention. It was recommended as a reference text for
high schools. It is an excellent book
and suitable for homeschoolers and those who want a less technical
presentation. OPAP is the primary text
covering the whole of ID. Dembski and
Wells have written something similar. An
episode of NOVA covered the Dover controversy.
Many
hold that ID supporters oppose Young Earth Science (YES). Creationist paleontologist Marcus Ross was at
one time a Fellow with the Discovery Institute. [1] Is this consistent with Jill Schneiderman’s
(Prof. of Earth Science, Vassar) claim that, “the bulk of intelligent design
creationists are old-Earth [support Old Earth Fallacies = OEF]…”? [2] Does “bulk” mean 70%, 80% ? Geologist Timothy Heaton holds that, “Most ID
authors accept the antiquity of the Earth …” [3] This would appear to mean at least 51% of ID
advocates are anti-YES.
The
co-author of OPAP, Dean Kenyon, accepts YES.
The “Critical Reviewers” of OPAP include such pro-YES scholars as John
Baumgardner and Kurt Wise. Nancy Pearcey
holds to fixity of kinds (see how this connects with YES below) and is one of
OPAP’s “Editors and Contributors.” [4]
OPAP
seems to favor fixity of kinds:
“…
speciation represents only limited change. … Speciation is a means of creating diversity
within types of living things …” [5]
“Many
scientists conclude that there never was a progression from one cluster [of
organisms] to another – that each really did originate independently. This idea accords with the theory of
intelligent design. Design theories
suggest that various forms of life began with their distinct features already
intact: fish with fins and scales, birds
with feathers and wings …” [6]
Man
is an intelligent designer and makes kinds
of things: chairs, tables, portraits, clocks, doors, ovens et cetera. People don’t take
a clock and “evolve” it into a toaster!
By the laws of thermodynamics, one creation is implied, so all kinds of
life began at the beginning. Given this
assumption, the only interpretation of the rock record that appears likely is a
Global Catastrophe. Fixity of Kinds è Global Flood è YES. OPAP points out that fossilization requires
rapid burial. [7]
Davis
and Kenyon reveal that, “Some [design proponents] take the view that the
earth’s history can be compressed into a framework of thousands of years …” [8]
Stephen
Meyer (Signature in the Cell)
co-wrote the “Afterword” for OPAP, but fails to realize the movement of ID
towards YES, despite his B.S. in Geology:
“…
design implies absolutely nothing about beliefs normally associated with
Christian fundamentalism, such as a young earth, a global flood, or even the
existence of the Christian God.” [9]
Quite
the contrary, philosopher Mortimer Adler (d. 2001) opposed evolution and
concluded that the Intelligent Designer must be the personal Creator who made
the cosmos. He also shows that it is
reasonable that one of the major world religions is true (Judaism, Christianity
or Islam). Based on Adler’s tests (world
evangelism, salvation, immanence v. transcendence and mystery), clearly
Christianity wins. [10] Adler himself
became a committed believer at the age of 82 in 1984.
Listen
to this erudite insight from philosopher, mathematician and Global Flood
supporter, William Dembski: “It is no
longer credible to conflate informed criticism of Darwinism [or OEF] with
ignorance, stupidity, insanity, wickedness, or brainwashing.” [11]
The
back cover of OPAP is blank – what does that tell you? For a hint, read here and here. Feedback welcome ± Contact info is in my profile (top right). The choice is yours – intelligent purpose or
pandemonium.
Notes:
1) For the Rock Record ed. by Jill
Schneiderman and Warren Allmon (Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley, CA, 2009), p.
86.2) Ibid., p. 12.
3) Ibid., p. 31.
4) Of Pandas and People by Percival Davis and Dean Kenyon (Haughton Pub., Dallas, TX, 1993, 2nd ed.), p. iii.
5) Davis and Kenyon, p. 19.
6) Ibid., p. 25.
7) Ibid., p. 21.
8) Ibid., p. 92.
9) Ibid., p. 161.
10) Truth in Religion: The Plurality of Religions and the Unity of Truth by Mortimer Adler (Macmillan Pub., NYC, NY, 1990), pp. 101-110.
11) “The Myths of Darwinism” by William Dembski in Uncommon Dissent ed. by William Dembski (ISI Books, Wilmington, DE, 2004), p. xxxvii.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


.jpg)


.jpg)

